Housing First: ‘Very Few Consequences

I love the Op-Ed section of the paper. I believe we all need to write at least one letter on something we’re passionate about in our lifetime. In saying that, I applaud this reader

Many old hotels and motels have been purchased to house those who are homeless and provide “services.” Unfortunately, this rarely makes for changed lives. Most (not all) clients don’t want counseling; they’re unable/unwilling to do the work mandated. I know this: I’ve been a counselor in the Washington state mental health system for 30 years.

Tent-city squalor follows them indoors, with garbage strewn on the floors, food ground into carpets, linens ripped, stained or missing. The plumbing is constantly clogged with hand towels, clothing, food, etc. TVs, microwaves and other appliances are frequently destroyed, often deliberately. Drug and alcohol abuse abounds, unchecked.

The idea that housing facilitates the work of change is valid, but most clients are not working toward change. There are very few consequences for actions. Even constructive criticism, e.g., commenting on the harmful effects of someone’s drug abuse, is avoided, as it’s now considered inappropriate to damage clients’ delicate sensibilities, which would violate their human dignity. This is all very unhelpful.

Bottom line: “Providing services” is not a panacea and the attached costs are but the down payment on a massive, continuing outlay of public funds with much less to show for it than one would hope.

Cindy M. Black, Seattle

This entry was posted in Reading and tagged , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to Housing First: ‘Very Few Consequences

  1. Yeah, homeless people need a paradigm shift! However, it must start somewhere and housing is vital. But there is so much more needed after that and it must planned ahead of time.

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a reply to msw blog Cancel reply